Constitutional Law -- The Supreme Court Can't Have it Both Ways Under RFRA: The Tale of Two Compelling Interest Tests. Gonzales v. O Centro Espirita Beneficente Uniao Do Vegetal, 126 S. Ct. 1211 (2006)

Authors

Aaron D. Bieber

Document Type

Case Notes

Subject Area

General Law Division

DOI

10.59643/1942-9916.1150

Recommended Citation

Aaron D. Bieber, Constitutional Law -- The Supreme Court Can't Have it Both Ways Under RFRA: The Tale of Two Compelling Interest Tests. Gonzales v. O Centro Espirita Beneficente Uniao Do Vegetal, 126 S. Ct. 1211 (2006), 7 Wyo. L. Rev. 225 (2007).
Available at: https://scholarship.law.uwyo.edu/wlr/vol7/iss1/7