Constitutional Law -- The Supreme Court Can't Have it Both Ways Under RFRA: The Tale of Two Compelling Interest Tests. Gonzales v. O Centro Espirita Beneficente Uniao Do Vegetal, 126 S. Ct. 1211 (2006)

Authors

Aaron D. Bieber

Document Type

Case Notes

Subject Area

General Law Division

DOI

10.59643/1942-9916.1150

Recommended Citation

Bieber, Aaron D. (2007) "Constitutional Law -- The Supreme Court Can't Have it Both Ways Under RFRA: The Tale of Two Compelling Interest Tests. Gonzales v. O Centro Espirita Beneficente Uniao Do Vegetal, 126 S. Ct. 1211 (2006)," Wyoming Law Review: Vol. 7: No. 1, Article 7.
Available at: https://scholarship.law.uwyo.edu/wlr/vol7/iss1/7